William Mapother

Blog Archives

Blog Categories

William's Blog

Countin’ the Bab(i)es

Posted on: March 9th, 2010 by wmapother 3 Comments

When Reno Wilson phones, I take the call.  Last year he and I were on the last two episodes of Prison Break as a pair of FBI agents, and I had trouble keeping a straight face at time during shooting.  He’s one funny man.  He also has the gift of being extremely, immediately likable, both in person and on screen.  I can’t stand him.

So he rings me up to do a cameo in a video he’s shooting for Funny or Die, and who am I to say No?  It’s called Babymaker and is in the Top 20 over at Funny or Die.  You can watch it and vote here.

The Award for Best Award goes to…

Posted on: March 7th, 2010 by wmapother 2 Comments

Friday night I inched downtown in typical L.A. traffic to attend the 25th Annual Spirit Awards, the Oscars for independent films.  The winners and some videos are here.

The outlines of the evening were fun:  I ran into old friends, enjoyed Eddie Izzard’s opening, and got swag to pass out to my sisters and agent.  My difficulty is with the stuff in between.  
Watching endless clips of good work makes me want to get work, like, immediately.  It falls somewhere between a challenge and an inspiration.  It doesn’t diminish my happiness for them or appreciation of their work, but I end up feeling like a player hopping on the sidelines, waiting for his squad to take the field.
My other thorn is the usual lament about award shows in general.  Not only comparing, but ranking, films (or books, music, etc.) reminds me of the quote sometimes attributed to Elvis Costello:  Writing about music is like dancing about architecture.  
I’m not demonizing such awards.  Objectifying the voters’ subjective responses doesn’t cause poverty or warfare.  But it does contribute to Americans’ discomfort with a lack of certainty and having to figure things out for ourselves — and those things are just what’s required from audience.  
Movies aren’t NCAA teams.  And the awards voters don’t have clear, or even agreed-upon, standards they use for voting.  Our accepting their collective messy, individual responses as having value for anyone but them makes it that much harder for us to have our our own messy, individual responses to the movies.  And isn’t that why we watch them?
P.S.  Colin Firth is remarkable in A Single Man.

Marketplace Pressures

Posted on: March 4th, 2010 by wmapother 2 Comments
I’m about 75% of the way through an intensive film finance conference/seminar, and Topic A is the pressures and changes facing the independent film market. Getting indies financed and produced is a bear these days, if you didn’t know.

The competition from videogames, the Internet, and content, content everywhere is making it harder than ever to penetrate our noisy culture and get your attention.  And the businessmen who finance movies (bless them) are responding to the challenge by using terms such as “content discovery” (audience awareness of a movie) and “transaction opportunity” (letting you buy wherever, whenever).

On the upside, however, are the many ever-increasing ways you can watch and the industry can shove, er, get them to you.  Screens in the bathroom — just what you need in your life, I know.

For those who want a longer discussion of what’s required by today’s independent filmmaker, Ted Hope tackled the subject in a post on his TrulyFreeFilm blog here.

Wish us well.  : )

Newmania

Posted on: February 27th, 2010 by wmapother 1 Comment

Note:  This represents something new for me and ATW:  non-work-related posts.  I’ve been postponing such a thing for some time now, and I’m still ambivalent about doing it and incredulous that anyone will have made it to the end of the second sentence.  (Of course, I never thought anyone would read my posts which are, in fact, work-related, but unless the metrics are off or my mom is refreshing like a coke fiend –which she is NOT, I assure you — a number of you have far too much time on your hands.  I know you have choices when you blow your time on Earth, so thank you for blowing it with me.)

Okay, so you’ve been warned.

Last Friday night I had the too-rare privilege of attending a performance by one of my absolute favorites, the singer-songwriter Randy Newman.  I’ve been an unabashed fan of his for a long, long time, since an ex-gf introduced me to his song “Guilty.”  (Relevance pointedly skipped here.)  The man’s been nominated for thirteen Grammies and nineteen Oscars (including two this year).  His website’s here.

Amidst my many reactions during his show was a marvelling at those crafts/art forms — eg, singing, dancing, acting — which produce no tangible product, versus those which do — eg, writing, sculpture, painting, and film.  I’m sure some academic/critic somewhere has coined terms to distinguish them, and I’m even more sure that as a former English major I should know them.  But I don’t.

The point is, it occurred to me while listening to Randy — yes, Randy, I met him once — that the two seem to produce quite different effects upon me.  I can’t find words right now to distinguish between the effects, but the former group tends to invoke a poignancy that the latter does not.  The fact that the first group is performed contributes to that poignancy, but at first blush I suspect it’s more due to their evanescence.  Every moment of experiencing those forms live, not recorded, contains both the death of the moment prior and the birth of the moment coming, coupled with the awareness that the moments cannot be recovered.  Sorrow and joy bound together, moment after moment after moment.

But maybe that’s just me.

I warned you.

One last note:  Randy usually sings in troubador style, that is, he sings in the first-person voice of a character.

Okay, off you go to discover:  I suggest trying songs from Sail Away, Good Old Boys, or Trouble in Paradise.  Or any of the animated movies he’s contributed to.  Or any of his albums.

On lala.com the great man is here.  On iTunes he’s here.

That’s all for now.  Whew.

note to self:  shorter posts.  people only have 75 years to blow.

Word (Up)!

Posted on: February 19th, 2010 by wmapother 1 Comment

So, for those of you who have been patiently, tirelessly waiting for me to do a show that children, or adults of delicate sensibilities, can safely watch, I’m thrilled to report that your sleepless nights are over.

In November 2008 I recorded an episode of ‘Wordgirl,’ thanks to the multi-hyphenated-great-guy Ryan Raddatz.  (My original blog post is here.)  This is the award-winning, funny and fantastic animated PBS show.  Each episode, the superhero Wordgirl teaches children two new vocabulary words, such as ‘economic’ or ‘meltdown.’  The ‘Wordgirl’ home page is here.  Think you can see it and not smile?  I doubt it.  : )

In my episode, “Mr. Big’s Mini-Golf,” I play Guy Rich, this handsome devil in boots.  What can I say?  The animators were very generous.

Well, apparently while I was hibernating last autumn, my episode of ‘Wordgirl’ snuck out past me and aired itself.  But never fear, it’s about to be rerun!  (Details below.)

It’s difficult to describe 1) how much fun it was to do (the producers and directors could not have been kinder), and 2) how amazing the other actors were.  I’d never been in a session like this, and I’m not exaggerating when I write that I was utterly in awe of their ability to control and manipulate their voices, even while improvising and in character.

One scene took place at a gathering of criminal masterminds, and the director asked them (the regulars on the show) to take turns improvising characters and lines.  They were off and running.  One would no sooner stop than another would begin, and from each of them, in only 10-15 words, a full — and hysterical — character emerged.  I nearly ruined the session by being laughing out loud, which I was able to avoid only because my jaw was hitting the floor.

Fortunately, we’d recorded most of my lines by that point.  I don’t think I could have followed that with anything but a squeak.

I’m not alone:  ‘Wordgirl’ just won the Kidscreen Award for Best Voice Talent.  Details here.  And toonzone.net just named it one of the Top 25 ‘Toons of the 2000’s.  Details here.

The first word of the day is humbling.

Broadcasts of the show vary somewhat among individual PBS stations, but it looks as if my episode, together with the ep “The Young and the Heartless,” will next air on March 3rd & 4th, then on April 26.  However, please check your local listings.  I suggest googling this — wordgirl “mini-golf” — along with the call letters of your local PBS station.  Also, as a reminder, over to the right at the top is the icon/link for the events calendar, which lists upcoming airings and events.

Finally, I just learned from a ‘Wordgirl’ producer that they’re waiting to hear if the show will be picked up for another year.  My suggestion:  Email Scholastic Media here to encourage them to keep Wordgirl aloft!

The second word of the day is Awesome.